RM Punk wrote:At least you said "best" which implies no set standard. Mainly because "Kevin Steen" and "good wrestling" don't usually set well in the same sentence, unless it was a sentence like "good wrestling never knew Kevin Steen" XD
I'm Wrestleholic_08 and I know you from the ROH boards. One of the reasons I posted this here, is because I am sick and tired of the stupid narrow view that most there seem to have when it comes to Steen. He doesn't try to do anything too flashy outside of his moonsault. He is bread and butter, along the lines of old big men like Dusty.
Does he call himself Mr. Wrestling? Hell ya, and it's digging under a lot of fans' skins because they hate that Steen, a guy that they feel has no talent, can call himself that. Danielson could call himself Mr. Wrestling for all I care. I could call myself Mr. Wrestling if I wanted to.
Steen, simply put, is a big guy that does the average (and yes head drops are as over as they were in 2002) and has big charisma. Another person with those attributes? Dusty Rhodes. A guy held in great respect these days as a wrestler